Last edited by Kajizahn
Sunday, August 2, 2020 | History

6 edition of democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century found in the catalog.

democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century

by Paul K. Huth

  • 162 Want to read
  • 9 Currently reading

Published by Cambridge University Press in Cambridge, New York .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Boundary disputes -- History -- 20th century,
  • Territory, National -- Research -- Methodology,
  • International relations,
  • Democracy,
  • World politics -- 20th century

  • Edition Notes

    Includes bibliographical references (p. 461-484) and index.

    StatementPaul K. Huth and Todd L. Allee.
    SeriesCambridge studies in international relations -- 82., Cambridge studies in international relations -- 82.
    ContributionsAllee, Todd L.
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsD443 .H854 2002
    The Physical Object
    Paginationxvii, 488 p. :
    Number of Pages488
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL18917903M
    ISBN 10052180115X, 0521805082
    LC Control Number2002031050
    OCLC/WorldCa50291192

    The third set of compilations is by Monty Marshall and Ted Robert Gurr, Peace and Conflict: A Global Survey of Armed conflicts, Self-Determination Movements, and DemocracyFirst published in , the Marshall/Gurr compilations were the first to point to a marked downturn in all forms of conflict after File Size: KB. He is the author of The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century(with Paul K. Huth, Cambridge University Press) as well as of more than 20 articles and book chapters that employ political economy approaches and quantitative methods to explain the origins, escalation, and settlement of trade, investment, and territorial disputes.

    SOME LINKS TO MATERIAL ON DEMOCRACY, DEMOCIDE, AND WAR which are topically archived. Finally, there is a comprehensive bibliography on the democratic peace, which although not linked to the sources, provides titles that can be searched for on the Internet. Twentieth Century Book Of The Dead. GENERAL GENOCIDE AND DEMOCIDE STATISTICS.   The 20th-century “war of the world” ended, Ferguson argues, with the conclusion of the Korean War in , though as he says, it is “absurd for us to .

      The Treaty of Versailles, signed in June at the Palace of Versailles in Paris at the end of World War I, codified peace terms between the victorious. 20th-century international relations, history of the relations between states, especially the great powers, from approximately to The history of the 20th century was shaped by the changing relations of the world’s great powers. The first half of the century, the age of the World Wars and the start of the Cold War, was dominated by the rivalries of those powers.


Share this book
You might also like
Losing me

Losing me

Family law and law reform

Family law and law reform

Electrochemical science and technology of polymers-2

Electrochemical science and technology of polymers-2

Cultural landscape report for Fort McHenry

Cultural landscape report for Fort McHenry

jubilee book of the Benedictines of Nashdom, 1914-1964.

jubilee book of the Benedictines of Nashdom, 1914-1964.

Table traits, with something on them

Table traits, with something on them

Selected short stories

Selected short stories

Inside psychotherapy

Inside psychotherapy

Update on Ebla (A-4)

Update on Ebla (A-4)

Introduction to stochastic differential equations

Introduction to stochastic differential equations

April folly

April folly

Basic education in India: its origins and development.

Basic education in India: its origins and development.

woman of thirty ; The deserted mistress

woman of thirty ; The deserted mistress

future of Hillview Estate

future of Hillview Estate

international river basin

international river basin

Democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century by Paul K. Huth Download PDF EPUB FB2

"The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century is in the vanguard of efforts to build better theories of international peace by breaking down existing accounts and parsing out their implications.

The study's findings are bound to shape thinking about the democratic peace and, thus, Cited by: This book presents a systematic reassessment of the theoretical and empirical foundations of the democratic peace literature.

Three distinct theoretical models of how domestic political institutions shape the foreign policy choices of state leaders are developed and Huth and Allee then test hypotheses from each model against an original data set of territorial disputes Cited by: "The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century is in the vanguard of efforts to build better theories of international peace by breaking down existing accounts and parsing out their cturer: Cambridge University Press.

The democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century. [Paul K Huth; Todd L Allee] -- "This book re-evaluates the foundations of the democratic peace literature and presents three distinct theoretical models of how domestic institutions can influence the foreign policy choices of.

The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century Paul K. Huth, Todd L. Allee It is commonly said that democracies very seldom fight each other.

This book asks whether the assumption of a "democratic peace" is valid and seeks to explain why. The book is empirical in the best sense of the word.' Political Science Quarterly "The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century is in the vanguard of efforts to build better theories of international peace.

This book presents a systematic reassessment of the theoretical and empirical foundations of the democratic peace literature. Three distinct theoretical models of how domestic political 4/5(1). The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge Studies in International Relations)的话题 (全部 条).

20 The democratic peace and territorial conflict. concerned about the outcomes of territorial disputes. For example, al- lies of states involved in territorial disputes are likely to be concerned about the outbreak of military confrontations and their possible escala- tion to Size: KB.

14 rows  The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge. The democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century.

This book re-evaluates the foundations of the democratic peace lit- erature and presents three distinct theoretical models of how do- mestic institutions can influence the foreign policy choices of state leaders–PoliticalAccountability,PoliticalNorms, Size: KB.

Read this book on Questia. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century by Paul K. Huth, Todd L. Allee, | Online Research Library: Questia Read the full-text online edition of The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century ().

The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, E-mail Citation» Application of the democratic peace to territorial conflict in the 20th century.

Presents a massive new data set on territorial conflicts. Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s Political Writings. 2d ed. Edited by Hans S. Reiss. Cambridge, UK:. Buy The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century, by Paul K. Huth, Todd L.

Allee, ISBNpublished by Cambridge University Press fromthe World's Legal Bookshop. 5 The correlation between the level of liberalism and peace was first suggested by Rummel (fn.

1) and incorporated in his Power Kills: Democracy as a Method of Nonviolence (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, ), 5 and chap. 3; echoed by Ray (fn. 2), Historical gradualism is tentatively noted in the article by Bruce Russet and Zeev Maoz, Cited by: Starr discusses the geographical and spatial features of border disputes.

Mitchell and Hensel provides an overview of the issue approach to world politics and describe issue datasets. Toft summarizes the literature connecting territorial disputes, civil wars, and interstate conflicts. Power kills, absolute Power kills absolutely.

This new Power Principle is the message emerging from my previous work on the causes of war 1 and this book on genocide and government mass murder--what I call democide--in this more power a government has, the more it can act arbitrarily according to the whims and desires of the elite, the more it will make war on.

Paul Huth is the author of The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century ( avg rating, 0 ratings, 0 reviews, published ). This book asks whether the assumption of a "democratic peace" is valid and seeks to explain why.

Explanations explored include the accountability of democratic leaders to domestic institutions; the norms of democratic competition which influence international affairs; and the common interests which democracies have : Paul K Huth; Todd L Allee.

continued into the twentieth century and the avoidance of war and the maintenance of peace have become a first-order concern for political thought. The concept of peace has traditionally been associated with the state of internationalFile Size: KB.

Democratic peace theory is a theory which posits that democracies are hesitant to engage in armed conflict with other identified democracies. Among proponents of the democratic peace theory, several factors are held as motivating peace between democratic states: Democratic leaders are forced to accept culpability for war losses to a voting public.Major Wars and Conflicts of The 20th Century The 20th Century was the bloodiest, costliest century of warfare in human history.

Two world wars, and a large number of major revolutions, along with significant social, political, and economic upheavals made the period from to of great importance in a historical and military sense.The spread of democracy in the 20th century.

During the 20th century the number of countries possessing the basic political institutions of representative democracy increased significantly. At the beginning of the 21st century, independent observers agreed that more than one-third of the world’s nominally independent countries possessed democratic institutions comparable to .